¶1This action not having been commenced within ten years after the cause accrued, it is, for the reasons given in Houts *476v. Hoyne, 14 S. D.—, 84 N. W. 773, barred under Section 4856, Comp. Laws, and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
14 S.D. 475
Houts v. Olson
Decided May 4, 1901
South Dakota Supreme Court · decided 1901-05-04
Hon. E. G. Smith, Judge. Suit by W. A. Houts and others against Christ Olson to redeem certain lands from a mortgage thereon, and for an accounting of rents and profits, suit being commenced more than io years after foreclosure sale, and more than ten years before the commencement of continued possession of the premises on the part of the purchaser at mortgage sale, and defendant claiming under him. From a decree in favor of defendant, complainants appeal.
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1931
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1901-05-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →