Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 SO2D 302 - Womack v. Burka

Womack v. Burka’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 1987
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on STANTON v. Embrey, Administrator · Suthon v. Laws · Levy v. McWilliams · Egan v. Hotel Grunewald Co. · Cutitto v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In determining what is a correct charge for professional services, there should be considered two things: first, the training and experience necessary and the seriousness of the treatment or operation; and, second, the ability of the defendant to pay. We do not mean that because a defendant may be a very rich man he may be required to pay an exorbitant charge, but we do mean that, where a defendant is shown to be well able to pay, the doctor should not be required to reduce his charge, and in fixing it, may take into consideration the fact that the patient has ample funds out of which to make the payment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.