Riley v. Riley’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 861 So. 2d 1218 - Solomon v. Solomon · 941 So. 2d 1233 - Baron v. Baron · 643 So. 2d 72 - Koeppel v. Holyszko · Bracero v. Bracero · 829 So. 2d 307 - Peiman v. Peiman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court must hear timely filed exceptions to a magistrate’s report. See Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.490(f); Betz v. Betz, 790 So.2d 1128, 1130 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Rule 12.490(f) provides, “The parties may serve exceptions to the report within 10 days from the time it is served on them.” Pursuant to rule 12.090 and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.090(e), the Husband had an additional five days to serve his exceptions because the magistrate’s report was served on him by mail. See Werntz v. Floyd, 814 So.2d 480, 481 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); Palmer v. Palmer, 582 So.2d 639 , 640 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.