¶1ORDER
¶2Antijuian Bohlen appeals the trial court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion for relief without an evidentiary hearing.
¶3The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
¶4We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).