Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 S.W.3d 732

State v. Dunger

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2000

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2000-04-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2001

1 state decisions

Relies on State v. Ozier

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-04-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Terry Dunger (“Defendant”) appeals from a judgment of conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, a violation of Section 195.211 *733RSMo (1994). Defendant alleges trial court error in overruling Defendant’s motions for mistrial. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion. State v. Ozier, 961 S.W.2d 95, 98 (Mo.App. E.D.1998). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/14/sw3d/732 · .json · Public domain