Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 SW3D 77 - State v. Shaw

State v. Shaw’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Batson v. Kentucky · Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · Swain v. State of Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “gender Batson " challenge for appellate review. "To preserve a Batson challenge, a timely and specific objection must be made at trial, the alleged error must be asserted in a motion for new trial, and the matter must be adequately raised in the briefs on appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a generic reference to Batson , without more, is insufficient to preserve a claim of error based upon a gender-motivated peremptory strike.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “plain error review and reversal are appropriate in this case in the interest of justice and consistency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.