Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 Tenn. 493

Wilson v. King

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1834

Tennessee Supreme Court · decided 1834-05-15

In this case the counsel for the plaintiffs below moved at the trial, after the evidence had been closed, to strike from the writ and declaration the name of Theresa M. King, one of the plaintiffs, because he had discovered that she had no interest in the suit, which the court permitted to be done, to which the defendant excepted, and on account of which this appeal in error is prosecuted.

Decided 1834-05-15

Green, J.

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2The court was right in permitting the amendment to be made. Such amendments have been often made and sanctioned by this court, as being authorized by the act of 1809, ch. 49, sec. 21. The judgment will therefore be affirmed.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/14/tenn/493 · .json · Public domain