Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 Tex. 229

Holt v. McCasky

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1855

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1855-07-01

<p>It is too late to move to dismiss a certiorari after the first Term of the Court; ' where the certiorari was dismissed on motion filed at the second Term, the judgment was reversed.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1855-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 1928

3 state decisions

1018551860187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Hemphill, Ch. J.

¶1This case was brought from a Justice’s Court into the District Court by a writ of certiorari. At the first Term, it was continued by the plaintiff. At the second, it was dismissed on motion of the defendant; and this judgment has, by writ of error, been brought up to this Court.

¶2The principal ground assigned for reversal is, that the motion to dismiss, not being filed at the return Term of the certiorari, came too late, and for that reason should have been overruled. And there is no doubt, under the decisions of this Court, that this is a valid ground of objection to the judgment.

¶3We have uniformly held, from the case of O’Brien v. Dunn, (5 Tex. R. 570,) that a motion to dismiss a certiorari must be made at the return Term. (10 Tex. R. 268, 285, 318.) The judgment is erroneous, and the same is hereby reversed, and the cause ordered to be remanded.

¶4Reversed and remanded.

/14/tex/229 · .json · Public domain