Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 U.S. 382 - Lindgren

Lindgren’s Empirical Analysis

14 U.S. 382 · 1816

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2020

3 district · 3 state decisions

301816182018301840185018601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lott v. Prudhomme · Succession of Johnson · Knight v. Murchison · Flanagan v. Demarest

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““If destined for the ordinary use of life in the enemy's country, they are not, in general, contraband; but it is otherwise if destined for military use. Hence, if destined for the army or navy of the enemy, or for his ports of naval or military equipment, they are deemed contraband.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.