Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 UTAH2D 192 - State v. Wood

State v. Wood’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1983
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Petersen v. Ohio Copper Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendants urge error * * * that the verdicts were contrary to the evidence and the presumption of innocence, and that the court and prosecutor prejudicially abused defendants’ rights by their conduct. The record does not reflect any such abuse, and the only point on appeal appearing to have any merit is that we decide here anent prematurity of appeal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.