Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 Va. App. 368 - Baugh v. Commonwealth

14 Va. App. 368 - Baugh v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
April 2008
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Chambers v. Mississippi · Pointer v. Texas · Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co. · Maryland v. Craig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may hear the case upon the certificate and any legal testimony adduced on either side.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “essential to prosecution of an offense. . . .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Contempt is defined as an act in disrespect of the court or its processes, or which obstructs the administration of justice, or tends to bring the court into disrepute.” 4A Michie’s Jurisprudence Contempt § 2 (Repl.Vol.1983). Any act which is calculated to embarrass, hinder, or obstruct the court in the administration of justice is contempt. Potts v. Commonwealth, 184 Va. 855, 859 , 36 S.E.2d 529, 530 (1946).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.