Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 VETAPP 116 - Stone v. Gober

Stone v. Gober’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 2011
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1112 · 38 U.S.C. § 1310 · 38 U.S.C. § 7104 · 38 U.S.C. § 7252

Relies on Gilbert v. Derwinski · Epps v. West · 11 Vet. App. 268 - Stegall v. West · Epps v. Gober · Douglas v. Derwinski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have received a medical opinion from the Under Secretary [for Health], with which we agree, that advises it is unlikely that the veteran's carcinoma of the rectum and anal area resulted from his exposure to ionizing radiation in service.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]here is no articulation of the Board's reasons for finding the [USB's] opinion convincing, but rather a mere restatement of [the USH's medical] opinion in conjunction with the denial of presumptive service connection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.