Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

14 Vt. 559

Durkee v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 15, 1842

Supreme Court of Vermont · decided 1842-01-15

This was a petition for a new trial in a cause tried in the county court. The petitionee pleaded in abatement the want of a recognizance for costs entered by the petitioner at the time of issuing the óitation.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1842-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 1935

3 state decisions

101842185018601870188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court.

¶1There is no statute requiring such recognizance to be entered; and no such practice has ever obtained. The tenth section of the thirty-third chapter of the Revised Statutes has reference only to that class of petitions named in the ninth section. We cannot consider the citation in this case a writ of summons within the terms of the fifth section of the twenty-eighth chapter of the Revised Statutes. The plea in abatement, therefore, must be overruled.

¶2The court held also in this case, that they could not proceed to the hearing of the case upon its merits, unless furnished with a properly authenticated copy of the minutes of the judge who tried the case in the county court, or evidence showing that such copy had been applied for and could not be obtained, in which case only would the court dispense with the copy of the minutes, and take the affidavit of the attorneys as to what passed at the trial.

/14/vt/559 · .json · Public domain