14 Wash. App. 115 - State v. Wanrow’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 47 U.S.C. § 605
Relies on Lawrence Metze v. New York · Olsen v. State of Nebraska Western Reference & Bond Association · 73 Wash. 2d 616 - State v. Martin · 73 Wash. 2d 660 - State v. Huson · 9 Wash. App. 260 - State v. Grant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“I do not think that they should have these things recorded when the people do not know they are being recorded. The point is that they are trying to make sure that they get the right address when they have a call to a robbery or they get the right address and so forth when a call comes in that the house is on fire . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“" (1) Recording incoming telephone calls to police and fire stations for the purpose and only for the purpose of verifying the accuracy of reception of emergency calls." RCW 9.73.090(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“emasculates the prohibition of RCW 9.73.050 and makes the limited purpose of the recording a sham.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.