Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 Wash. App. 348 - State v. Walker

14 Wash. App. 348 - State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2010

14 state decisions

6019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dixon · 40 Cal. App. 2d 740 - People v. James · State v. Bock · 58 Cal. App. 123 - People v. MacKey · 2 Wash. App. 241 - State v. Tate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e hold the Washington legislature intended to restrict the use of prior convictions for impeachment purposes to defendants in subsequent prosecutions just as did the California legislature. When so read, the proviso or exception is construed strictly; when a statute provides for certain exceptions, no other exceptions will be assumed by implication. Hall v. Corporation of Catholic Archbishop, 80 Wn.2d 797 , 498 P.2d 844 (1972); Insurance Co. of North America Cos. v. Sullivan, 56 Wn.2d 251 , 352 P.2d 193 (1960). Moreover, RCW 9.95.240, being a remedial statute should be construed liberally so as to give effect to its purpose, 2A Sutherland Statutory Construction § 57.12 (3d ed. rev. 1973), that is, to treat an individual whose conviction has been expunged as a full-fledged citizen unless the statute clearly intends to preserve some taint of the conviction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.