14 Wash. App. 414 - State v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably 88 Wash. 2d 899 - State v. Partin (1977), 79 Wash. App. 755 - State v. Lopez (1995)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 77 Wash. 2d 27 - State v. Callahan · 73 Wash. 2d 372 - State v. Weiss · 1 Wash. App. 614 - State v. Potts · 5 Wash. App. 661 - State v. Fitzpatrick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`bare possession ... absent other facts and circumstances'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“(a) Prosecutor's Obligations. (1) . . . the prosecuting attorney shall disclose to the defendant the following material and information within his possession or control no later than the omnibus hearing: (ii) any written or recorded statements and the substance of any oral statements made by the defendant, (h) Regulation of Discovery. (2) Continuing duty to disclose. If, after compliance with these standards or orders pursuant thereto, a party discovers additional material or information which is subject to disclosure, he shall promptly notify the other party or his counsel of the existence of such additional material, and if the additioñal material or information is discovered during trial, the court shall also be notified. (7) Sanctions. (i) If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with an applicable discovery rule or an order issued pursuant thereto, the court may order such party to permit the discovery of material and information not previously disclosed, grant a continuance, dismiss the action or enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Whether a passenger's occupancy of a particular part of an automobile would constitute dominion and con trol of either the drugs or the area in which they are found would depend upon the particular facts in each case. Mere proximity to the drugs is not enough to establish constructive possession—it must be established that the defendant exercised dominion and control over either the drugs or the area in which they were found.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.