Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 14 Wash. App. 658 - State v. Nelson

14 Wash. App. 658 - State v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
4
states following
February 1998
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 1998

17 state decisions

130197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Florida · Wardius v. Oregon · Baldwin v. New York Williams · 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker · 71 Wash. 2d 621 - State v. Boehme

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(i) If at any time during the course of the proceedings it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with an applicable discovery rule or an order issued pursuant thereto, the court may order such party to permit the discovery of material and information not previously disclosed, grant a continuance, dismiss the action or enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"(i) the names and addresses of persons whom the prosecuting attorney intends to call as witnesses at the hearing or trial, together with any written or recorded statements and the substance of any oral statements of such witnesses;" (Italics ours.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The adversary system of trial is hardly an end in itself; it is not yet a poker game in which players enjoy an absolute right always to conceal their cards until played.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.