¶1Under the circumstances, we find that the Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant’s pro se motion to withdraw his pleas without holding an evidentiary hearing (see, People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927). Mollen, P. J., Lawrence, Fiber, Sullivan and Balletta, JJ., concur.
140 A.D.2d 536
People v. Colon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 16, 1988
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1988-05-16
Decided 1988-05-16