In Re Duncan’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2015
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 15 U.S.C. § 1671 · 15 U.S.C. § 1672 (Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Murray v. Zuke · 6 Kan. App. 2d 863 - Coward v. Smith · In Re Marshburn · Olson v. Townsend · MDFC Equipment Leasing Corp. v. Glickman (In Re Glickman)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subjected, to garnishment may not exceed (1) Twenty-five percent (25%) of his disposable earnings for that week....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Lawrence“apply equally to individuals working as independent contractors as well as to those engaged in traditional employee relationships”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.