In Re Panayotoff’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2016
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1141 · 11 U.S.C. § 362
Relies on Joe DeLisi Fruit Co. v. Minnesota, Department of Agriculture (In Re Joe DeLisi Fruit Co.) · Estate of Nelson v. Robbins · Metro Mill & Casework, Inc. v. Fiedler (In Re Fiedler) · Blarney, Inc. v. City of Saint Paul (In Re Blarney, Inc.)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“judicial, administrative, or other action or proceeding against the debtor,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.