Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 Cal. App. 4

Smith v. Rothschild

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1934

California Court of Appeal · decided 1934-07-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1934

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-07-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOURSE, P. J.

¶1The plaintiffs have moved to dismiss or affirm under the rule upon the grounds that the appeal is frivolous and presents grounds so unsubstantial as not to require further argument. The motion was accompanied by a typewritten brief fully arguing the merits of the appeal. When this motion is made for the purpose of advancing the hearing of an appeal on the merits, or to avoid preparation of a brief under the rules, it should be denied. The motion in this ease is of that character.

¶2Motion denied.

¶3Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

/140/calapp/4 · .json · Public domain