People v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
91 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably 71 Cal. 2d 18 - People v. De Santiago (1969), 54 Cal. 2d 846 - People v. Hammond (1960)
91 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brinegar v. United States · 44 Cal. 2d 434 - People v. Cahan · 45 Cal. 2d 755 - People v. Martin · People v. Maddox · Willson v. Superior Court
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whenever an utterance is offered to evidence the state of mind which ensued in another person in consequence of the utterance, it is obvious that no assertive or testimonial use is sought to be made of it, and the utterance is therefore admissible, so far as the Hearsay rule is concerned.” (Emphasis the author’s.)”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'The term, probable, has been defined as meaning”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Paul · People v. Merino““A peace-officer may make an arrest in obedience to a warrant delivered to him, or may, without a warrant, arrest a person. ... 5. At night, when there is reasonable cause to believe that he has committed a felony.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.