Cole v. Calaway’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently July 2006
7 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 9 Cal. 2d 103 - Telford v. New York Life Insurance · 55 Cal. App. 2d 238 - People v. Caldwell · Iverson v. Metropolitan Life Etc. Co. · Hunt v. L. M. Field, Inc. · Mirich v. Underwriter's at Lloyd's London
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We read these sections [Civil Code section 1691 and Insurance Code section 650] together so that the later should be interpreted as meaning that the insurer may rescind at any time within the statutory period providing no action has been commenced upon the policy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“any inconsistency between section 1691 of the Civil Code and section 650 of the Insurance Code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[n]eglect to communicate that which a party knows, and ought to communicate * * *,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.