Leadam v. Ringgold & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
140 F. 611 · 1905
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
January 1912
most recently cited
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Hobbs v. Beach · New York Grape Sugar Co. v. Buffalo Grape Sugar Co. · Fitz v. Leadam · Curtis Davis & Co. v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The herein-described tree for boots and shoes comprising the toe or forward member, a heel or rear member bifurcated at its forward end and having a pin extending across the bifurcation, and a bar pivotally connected with the toe member and adapted to rest in the bifurcation of the heel member and having a longitudinal slot receiving the pin of the heel member and also having a device adjustable in the direction of its length for engaging the pin of .the heel member, substantially as specified.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.