Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 F. 989

Docket No. 39.

Thomas v. Schwarz

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1906.)

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1906-01-15

<p>Appeal from the Circuit Court of thes United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 1912

1 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Schwarz

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by George Gray · Decided 1906-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Appeal from the Circuit Court of thes United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

¶2Jasper Yates Brinton and J. Whitaker Thompson, for appellant.

¶3Before DALLAS and GRAY, Circuit Judges, and BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

¶4GRAY, Circuit Judge.

¶5This is an appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (140 Fed. 302), affirming the decision of the Board of General Appraisers, as to the classification of certain merchandise for customs duty, entered at the port of Philadelphia. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinon of the learned judge of the court below. As we agree with the conclusions of law arrived at, and the reasons in support thereof, as set forth in that opinion, we adopt the same as our own. The decree of the court below is affirmed.

/140/f1d/989 · .json · Public domain