Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 F.2d 175

Docket Misc. No. 39.

In re Greene

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1944-01-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1945

1 federal appellate ·

1 counsel of record

Relies on Brosius v. Botkin

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1944-01-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1William W. Greene, pro se.

¶2Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and EDGERTON and ARNOLD, Associate Justices.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4Petitioner has applied to this court for a writ in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus, but since no statute confers upon this court jurisdiction to entertain such an original petition it must be denied. Brosius v. Botkin, 72 App.D.C. 29, 110 F.2d 49.

¶5Petition denied.

/140/f2d/175 · .json · Public domain