Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 F.2d 176 - White v. Union Producing Co.

White v. Union Producing Co.’s Empirical Analysis

140 F.2d 176 · 1944

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
September 2005
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently September 2005

15 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1001944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co. · Traer v. Clews · McIntire v. Pryor · Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Terry · Fornea v. Goodyear Yellow Pine Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is a distinction between the case of an individual who imprudently executes a contract without reading it, and of one who signs a contract in reliance upon fraudulent misrepresentations as to its contents.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.