Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 F.2d 337 - Shima v. Brown

Shima v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

140 F.2d 337 · 1943

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
July 1985
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 1985

9 federal appellate · 10 state decisions

8019431950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on New York Co v. Estill · Newton v. Consolidated Gas Co. · Duke Power Co. v. Greenwood County · Estate of Hague v. Commissioner · Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Trial courts have large discretion in regard to costs, and it is not the function of appellate courts to substitute their own discretion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.