Dilatush v. Highfill’s Empirical Analysis
140 F.2d 741 · 1944
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1991
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 41
Relies on City of Indianapolis v. Chase Nat Bank of City of New York · Sutton v. English · Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co. · Republic Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. · Rex Co. v. International Harvester Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there was no evidence that the [defendant] was to share in or have any interest in the recovery the [plaintiff] might obtain in the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.