Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 F.2d 81 - Kelly v. Dowd

Kelly v. Dowd’s Empirical Analysis

140 F.2d 81 · 1944

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
August 2000
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently August 2000 · most notably Negrich v. Hohn (1967), Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGee (1963)

56 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3101944195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Mooney v. Holohan · Fenner v. Boykin · Beal v. Missouri Pac Rr Corporation · Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The jurisdiction to interfere with the proceedings of state governmental bodies charged with the prosecution and punishment of offenders is an exceedingly delicate one to be exercised with the greatest of care and nicest sense of propriety.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The acts of prison officials, vested with a rather wide discretion in safekeeping and securing prisoners committed to their custody and charged with the right and duty to maintain discipline among the inmates, should be upheld if reasonably necessary to effectuate the purposes of imprisonment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.