Sloan v. West’s Empirical Analysis
140 F.3d 1255 · 1998
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably Zimmerman v. Oregon Department of Justice (1999), Coons v. Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (2004)
32 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 5 U.S.C. § 1201 (Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989) · 5 U.S.C. § 7512 · 5 U.S.C. § 7521 · 5 U.S.C. § 7701 · 5 U.S.C. § 7702 · 5 U.S.C. § 7703
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Montana v. United States · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Burnett v. New York Central Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1)arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (2) obtained without procedures required by law, rule, or regulation having been followed; or (3) unsupported by substantial evidence.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]hen a federal employee claims he or she has been affected by both an 'adverse employment action' and a related Title VII violation, administrative remedies may be exhausted for Title VII purposes by asserting both claims before the MSPB.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Furey v. Mnuchin · Butler v. West“If the intent of Congress is clear from the face of the statutory language, we must give effect to the unambiguously expressed Congressional intent.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.