Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 F.3d 433 - Cooper v. Parsky

Cooper v. Parsky’s Empirical Analysis

140 F.3d 433 · 1998

Citation profile

287
cited by 287 later decisions
2
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 36 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 287 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C. (2010), Derek Tolbert v. Queens College the City University of New York Stuart Liebman Helen Smith Cairns Eric Gander (2001)

15 federal appellate · 36 district · 3 state decisions

20201998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain · Carden v. Arkoma Associates · Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 287 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.'”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “may not sue upon a duty which was expressly excluded from the Agreement”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “clear that [the defendants] were not to be held to the ordinary standard of care applicable to fiduciaries.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.