Catanzaro v. Weiden’s Empirical Analysis
140 F.3d 91 · 1998
Citation profile
11 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 64 later decisions — most recently February 2018 · most notably Kerzer v. Kingly Manufacturing (1998), Tellier v. Fields (2000)
11 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Anderson v. Creighton · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Parratt v. Taylor · Malley v. Briggs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he possibility of administrative error inheres in any regulatory program; statutory programs authorizing emergency administrative action prior to a hearing are no exception.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Stephen Catanzaro“if a pattern of abuse and arbitrary action were discernable from review of an agency's administration of a summary procedure,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Stephen Catanzaro“traditionally a jury resolves questions about a tortfeasor's state of mind”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.