Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 F. App'x 470

Youngs v. Reilly

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 1, 2005

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-08-01

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2005-08-01

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Lucho Humberto Youngs, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing as moot his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). Because Youngs failed to challenge on appeal the ground on which the district relied to dismiss the petition, he has waived appellate review of that issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Youngs’ motions for appointment of counsel and for production of documents and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED

/140/fappx/470 · .json · Public domain