Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 F. App'x 488

Bennett v. Bledsoe

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided August 3, 2005

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-08-03

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2005-08-03

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Ellowood Eugene Bennett appeals the district court’s judgment adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record, the district court’s order and the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Bennett v. Bledsoe, No. CA-03-114 (N.D.W.Va. Jan. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED

/140/fappx/488 · .json · Public domain