140 Fla. 191 - Ross v. State

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1963

5 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Per Curiam. —

¶1 To a judgment of conviction of manslaughter under an information charging murder in the second degree, defendant sued out writ of error and, on review, challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

¶2 The evidence as disclosed by the bill of exceptions has been examined and is found to be amply sufficient to support the judgment.

¶3 An examination of the entire record fails to disclose reversible error.

¶4 Judgment is affirmed.

¶5 So ordered.

¶6 Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Chapman, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Whitfield and Brown not participating as authorized by Section' 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.