Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 Ga. App. 300 - Hagin v. Powers

140 Ga. App. 300 - Hagin v. Powers’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2009

15 state decisions

501976198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. Derby · 113 Ga. App. 328 - Hoard v. Wiley · 121 Ga. App. 1 - Insurance Co. of North America v. Atlas Supply Co. · Doyal Development Co. v. Blair · 121 Ga. App. 560 - Sisk v. Carney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n owner of property may not testify as to his opinion of the value of the property in a single or gross amount without 'giving his reasons therefor’ ” or else showing”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Opinion evidence, to have probative value, must be based upon a foundation that the witness “has some knowledge, experience or familiarity with the value of the property in question or similar property and he must give reasons for the value assessed and also must have had an opportunity for forming a correct opinion. . . . Absent this foundation, the opinion as to value is inadmissible as it is nothing more than an ‘unsupported conclusion or guess of the witness.’ ” Sisk v. Carney, 121 Ga. App. 560, 563 ( 174 SE2d 456 ).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.