Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 Ga. App. 351 - State v. Travitz

140 Ga. App. 351 - State v. Travitz’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 2010

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 8 state decisions

5019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 137 Ga. App. 369 - State v. McCranie · 128 Ga. App. 456 - Denson v. State · 133 Ga. App. 10 - Fluellen v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was not under arrest at the time the officer proceeded to conduct the inventory. The car had not been impounded by the police and the record fails to disclose that any impoundment was intended. Indeed, it fails to even suggest any necessity of police custody. Defendant’s car was being towed away by a wrecking service of his choice to a destination of his choice and he was present and physically capable of making arrangements for the safekeeping of his belongings. 8”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “reasonable where the inventory is aimed at securing or protecting the car and its contents as well as the protection of the police against claims or disputes over lost or stolen property. [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.