State v. Davis.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[r]ecords, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Dumford · State v. Abrigo.

2. “because it is missing the data from the Accuracy Test that is necessary to establish strict compliance with HAR § 11-114-7, which is required to show that the Intoxilyzer was in proper working order, and it is inadmissible hearsay. In Davis, the prosecution attempted to satisfy the foundational element that the Intoxilyzer was in proper working order by introducing the sworn statements of an Intoxilyzer supervisor, which included the data results of the most recent Accuracy Test, and stated that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Dumford

3. “A person commits the offense of operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant if the person operates or assumes actual physical control of a vehicle: (1) While under the influence of alcohol in an amount sufficient to impair the person's normal mental faculties or ability to care for the person and guard against casualty[.]”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Abrigo.