State v. Tsujimura.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the State may not use as substantive proof of guilt a defendant's prearrest silence that occurs at least as of the time of detention, for doing so would 3 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). A critical safeguard [of the privilege against self-incrimination] is the Miranda warning: an accused must be”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Giugliano

2. “[p]roscribing the use of prearrest silence that occurs at least as of the time that a person has been detained is ... consistent with the well-established tenet that a person being questioned by a law enforcement officer during an investigatory stop is not obliged to respond.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Abella

3. “When an error amounts to a violation of the privilege against compelled self-incrimination under article I, section 10 [of the Hawai#i Constitution], the analysis proceeds to whether the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Nguyen