¶1delivered the opinion of the court.
¶2Defendant was a gratuitous bailee of the horse for his own benefit, and therefore bound to the use of extraordinary care, and liable for slight negligence. The plaintiff was only bound to show that the horse was injured while in the possession of the defendant, for if it was injured while in his possession the law presumes negligence and casts upon the defendant the burden to show that he exercised proper care. It is immaterial that the keeper of the coal yard and the father of the plaintiff drove the horse at defendant’s request, or that he sent the horse home by plaintiff’s father. The horse must be regarded as in the possession of the defendant from the time it was taken from plaintiff’s stable until it was returned, and when defendant permitted others to drive or take charge of the horse for him, he was bound to see that they exercised the same care that he was bound to exercise.
¶3The precise question presented, then, is: Could the jury, from the fact that the horse fell sick some hours after it was returned to the plaintiff, and died shortly thereafter, properly find that the horse was injured while in defendant’s possession, and that such sickness and death was caused by, or was the result of such injury?
¶4The fact that the horse threw itself must be disregarded, because it clearly appears that this occurred without any negligence on the part of its driver, who was on his seat with the lines in his hand when it occurred.
¶5The only other fact relied upon to show that the horse was injured while in defendant’s possession was the hauling of two tons of coal at one load. If it be conceded that the jury might, without any evidence upon the subject, find that this was too heavy a load for a horse of the weight and age of the horse of the plaintiff, the question still remains whether from that fact, taken in connection with the other evidence in the record, they could properly find that by such overloading the horse was injured.
¶6There is no evidence tending to show either the nature or the cause of the horse’s sickness, nor evidence that making him pull a load of two tons was competent to cause or would tend to cause or bring on such sickness. Horses fall sick and die of diseases brought on by other causes than injuries. From the fact that the horse was found to be sick some hours after its return to the plaintiff’s stable and shortly afterwards died, the jury could not, we think, find as a fact that it was injured while in the possession of the defendant.
¶7We find in the record no evidence to warrant a finding that the sickness and death of plaintiff’s horse was caused by any negligence of the defendant, and the judgment will therefore be reversed with a finding of facts, but the cause will not be remanded.
¶8Reversed, with finding of facts.