140 Md. App. 445 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States Accardi v. Shaughnessy · United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's Counsel · Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. Banks · United States v. Heffner · Frost v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“N. Special Project Credit for Double-Celled Inmates. (1) Inmates who meet the eligibility criteria in § N(2) are in a special project pursuant to Article 27, § 700(f), Annotated Code of Maryland[ [5] ], except inmates who are serving a: (a) Sentence for murder, rape, sex offenses, child abuse, drug trafficking or distribution, or use of a firearm in the commission of a felony; (b) Mandatory sentence for the commission of a felony; or (c) Sentence as a repeat offender under Article 27, § 643B, Annotated Code of Maryland.[ [6] ] (2) Inmates eligible for special project credits under this section are inmates who: (a) Have agreed to be voluntarily double-celled; (b) Are double-celled in an institution which is required by court order to be single-celled or by court order has a population cap and the population cap is exceeded; (c) Are double-celled in an institution which is not under court order but where the number of double cells exceeds the single-cell design capacity of the institution; or (d) Are housed in a dormitory or dormitory-type housing and the housing area where the inmates are confined does not provide 55 square feet of living space per inmate exclusive of dayrooms, toilets, and showers. (3) Inmates who meet the criteria described above shall receive 5 days credit for each calendar month, and on a prorated basis for any portion of a calendar month, beginning on the date and ending on the date the Secretary determines appropriate, based on the demand for inmate hous”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“the Secretary and Commissioner have authority to abolish, to revoke, or to revise the eligibility standards for double celling. Under section 3-707 [of the Correctional Services Article], they may determine whether any special project credits are available, what projects earn such credits, how may credits may be earned, and who may earn them.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“F. Special Projects Credit for Housing. (1) Except as provided in § F(3) of this regulation, an inmate may be awarded special projects credit for housing under Correctional Services Article, § 3-707, Annotated Code of Maryland, if the inmate is: (a) Assigned to a cell containing two beds and is not serving a period of disciplinary segregation; or (b) Housed in a dormitory or dormitory-type housing and the housing area where the inmate is confined does not provide 55 square feet of living space per inmate, exclusive of dayrooms, toilets, and showers. (2) An inmate may be awarded a maximum of five special projects credits for housing for each calendar month, and on a prorated basis for any portion of a calendar month, beginning on a date and ending on a date the Secretary determines appropriate, based on the demand for inmate housing and services in the Division, subject to §§ F(3) and G of this regulation. (3) An inmate may not be awarded special projects credit under this section during the inmate's term of confinement if the inmate is serving a term of confinement that includes a: (a) Sentence for: (i) Abduction; (ii) Arson in the first degree; (iii) Carjacking or armed carjacking; (iv) Kidnaping; (v) Manslaughter, except involuntary manslaughter; (vi) Mayhem and maiming, as previously proscribed under Article 27, §§ 384-386, Annotated Code of Maryland; (vii) Murder or attempted murder; (viii) Use of a handgun in the commission of a felony or other crime of violence; (ix) Ch”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.