Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 Misc. 24

People v. Cavo

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · decided 1930-01-15

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1933

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1930-01-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, with thirty dollars costs to appellants, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

¶2Upon the facts disclosed, there seems to have been no violation of sections 198 to 201 of the Farms and Markets Law (now Agriculture and Markets Law, as changed by Laws of 1927, chap. 207). The “ cream soda ” in question contained a small quantity of saccharin, but these provisions do not prohibit its use, nor require its presence to be stated upon the label “ Cream soda ” is a compound or mixture and may be sold under its own distinctive name according to the provisions of the sections mentioned, There is no prohibition in these sections against the use of saccharin in “ cream soda,” and there is no proof to show that it is either injurious or deleterious.

¶3All concur; present, Cropsey, MacCrate and Lewis, JJ.

/140/misc/24 · .json · Public domain