Dawson v. Krolikowski’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2008
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he intent and purpose of the[se] enforcement statutes is to enable a former spouse to enforce a support judgment against 'income,' in a priority basis over the income execution of a normal judgment creditor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“levy pursuant to this section or an income deduction order pursuant to section 5242 of this chapter shall take priority over any other assignment, levy or process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any earned, unearned, taxable or non-taxable income.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.