Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 Miss. 217

105 So 501

Cannon v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1925

Mississippi Supreme Court · decided 1925-10-12

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1953

4 state decisions

Relies on Foster v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1925-10-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*220 Smith, C. J.,

¶1 delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2 This is an appeal from a conviction for petit larceny, and the only assignment of error to which response is necessary is that the court below erred in permitting the district attorney to amend the affidavit on which the case was tried. The case originated in the court of a justice of the peace, and the affidavit as originally drawn alleged ownership of the property in Forest "Willis. When the case came on for trial in the circuit court, the district attorney was permitted over the objection of the appellant, to amend the affidavit by alleging the ownership of the property in Forest Willis and three other persons, naming them, who, according to the evidence, were joint owners of the property. This amendment was necessary “to bring the merits of the case fairly to trial on the charge intended to be set out in the original affidavit,” and consequently the court below committed no *221 error in permitting it to be made. Section 1511, Code of 1906 (Hemingway’s Code, section 1269); Foster v. State, 52 Miss. 695.

¶3 Affirmed.

/140/miss/217 · .json · Public domain