Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

140 Mo. 281

Ramsey v. Shannon

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 22, 1897

Supreme Court of Missouri · decided 1897-06-22

<p>Appellate Practice: non-compliance with bules of court. Consolidated rules 15 and 16 of the Supreme Court require the appellant to file “an abstract or abridgment of the record setting forth so much thereof as is necessary to a full understanding of all the questions presented to this court for decision.’’ When these rules are not complied with, a motion to dismiss the appeal will be sustained.*</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 1905

2 state decisions

Relies on Jayne v. Wine

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Appeal dismissed · Decided 1897-06-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Sherwood, J.

¶1In this cause a motion has been filed by respondent to dismiss the appeal taken herein. This is an equitable proceeding, having for its object the redemption of land sold for the payment of taxes, plaintiff not having been made a party defendant to the suit to enforce the State’s lien for such taxes. The circuit court allowed her to redeem, and from the decree in plaintiff’s favor defendant appeals.

¶2Consolidated rules 15 and 16 of this court require that appellant file “an abstract or abridgment of the record setting forth so much thereof as is necessary to a full understanding of all the questions presented to this court for decision.”

¶3The obvious object of these rules is that no reference to the record need be made, but that the court *282may rely for its information on the abstract alone. No attempt has been made in this cause to comply with these rules, and consequently the motion filed by plaintiff must prevail. Rule 19, Sup. Ct. Rules; Jayne v. Wine, 98 Mo. 404.

¶4Therefore appeal dismissed.

All concur.
/140/mo/281 · .json · Public domain