Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 140 MOAPP 321 - Wills v. Forester

Wills v. Forester’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 1998
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 1998

10 state decisions

40191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Diamond Match Co. v. . Roeber · Jaquith v. Hudson · May v. Crawford · Phoenix Ins. Co. v. . Continental Ins. Co. · McCurry v. Gibson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “these that the performance of the contract was”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.