140 N.C. App. 327 - State v. Walston’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
July 2016
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Cronin · State v. Speckman · 14 N.C. App. 394 - State v. Norman · State v. Qualls · 130 N.C. App. 1 - State v. Qualls
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'(1) a false representation of a subsisting fact or a future fulfillment or event, (2) which is calculated and intended to deceive, (3) which does in fact deceive, and (4) by which one person obtains or attempts to obtain value from another.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he evidence in a criminal case must correspond with the allegations of the indictment which are essential and material to charge the offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In determining the presence or absence of the element of intent, the jury may consider the acts and conduct of the defendant and general circumstances existing at the time of the alleged commission of the offense charged [.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.