140 N.C. App. 362 - Williamson v. Williamson’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
34 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Quick v. Quick · Woodard v. Mordecai · 32 N.C. App. 154 - Montgomery v. Montgomery · 89 N.C. App. 476 - Appalachian Poster Advertising Co. v. Harrington · Owensby v. Owensby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]or the greater part, [the findings of fact] are only recitations of the evidence”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“indicated by the trial court's repeated statements that a witness 'testified' to certain facts or other words of similar import”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]hile Rule 52(a) does not require a recitation of the evidentiary and subsidiary facts required to prove the ultimate facts, it does require specific findings of the ultimate facts established by the evidence, admissions and stipulations which are determinative of the questions involved in the action and essential to support the conclusions of law reached.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.