140 N.C. App. 600 - State v. Madry’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Westbrooks · 109 N.C. App. 136 - State v. Ainsworth · State v. Polk · State v. Hundley · 26 N.C. App. 486 - State v. Bohannon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that a defendant may adequately prepare his defense and be able to plead double jeopardy if he is again tried for the same offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“To be sufficient, any charging instrument, whether an indictment, arrest warrant, or otherwise, must allege all essential elements of the crime sought to be charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]nstead of issuing an amendment, the State should have filed a statement of charges to rectify the situation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.